Many still don’t get pension transfer riskNews added by Benefits Pro on June 11, 2014
BenefitsPro

Benefits Pro

Joined: September 07, 2011

My Company

By Lisa Barron

Interest is high but there are still plenty of employers with pension plans who don’t know or are just vaguely aware of pension risk transfer products.

That’s according to the latest survey by the LIMRA Secure Retirement Institute, which found that 80 percent of employers who offer defined benefit retirement plans say they are interested in pension risk transfer products.

Yet one in five of the nearly 400 DB plan sponsors polled were not familiar with pension risk transfer products and half were only somewhat familiar with such products. Plan sponsors who were more familiar with them expressed greater interest, as did plan sponsors with frozen plans.

“Managing the financial liability around a company’s pension plan is one of the most challenging responsibilities for a company,” said Alison Salka, senior vice president and director of the LIMRA Secure Retirement Institute. “It is critical that the decision-makers at these companies understand all of the financial options to manage their pension liability to make an informed decision that serves the unique needs of their company.”

The survey found that half of the traditional DB plans were open to new participants, while 36 percent were partially frozen and 14 percent were completely frozen. Plans with more than $250 million in assets were more likely to be open to new participants (69 percent) than smaller plans (47 percent).

Most of the plan sponsors surveyed, 55 percent, use a liability-driven investment strategy to address the risk of their DB plans, while others said they have considered or established risk options such as lump-sum payouts and group annuity buyouts.

The main reasons that sponsors are not interested in pension risk transfer products are lack of knowledge, use of another method to mitigate the risk, the purchasing costs of annuities and negative perceptions by stockholders, the survey found.

“There is a misconception that the cost of transferring the risk through an annuity would be prohibitive but recent analysis by Mercer found that it was slightly cheaper for a plan sponsor to purchase a buyout for the retiree portion of its plan than it was to keep it in-house,” said Salka. “We expect the growing impact of DB plans on balance sheets is going to drive more CFOs and others in finance to learn about and consider pension risk transfers in the future.”

Originally published on BenefitsPro.com
The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily those of ProducersWEB.
Reprinting or reposting this article without prior consent of Producersweb.com is strictly prohibited.
If you have questions, please visit our terms and conditions
Post Press Release