MLR bill passes House Energy & Commerce CommitteeNews added by National Underwriter on September 20, 2012
By Arthur D. Postal and Elizabeth Festa
Legislation that would exempt agent commissions from the medical loss ratio (MLR) calculation mandated under the health care reform law passed a House committee today.
The bill is H.R. 1206. It is sponsored by Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., and Rep. John Barrow, D-Ga. It was introduced last March.
The bill was passed by voice vote by the House Energy and Commerce Committee (E&C). The vote was 26-14.
However, given that both the House and Senate will recess Friday until after the November election, final action is unlikely before late fall.
And, the legislation is controversial and while it could pass the House, its future in the more evenly-divided Senate is problematic, according to analysts at Washington Analysis.
The bill has strong support within the agent community, with the Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of America (IIABA), the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors (NAIFA) and the National Association of Health Underwriters (NAHU) all voicing strong support.
However, Charles E. Symington, senior vice president for government affairs for the IIABA, acknowledged in a statement that the “the window of opportunity for the bill to become law this year is quickly narrowing.”
He said the IIABA commends the bill’s sponsors, Rogers and Barrow, for their diligent work on this issue and asks Congress to build on ''recent momentum to pass this crucial fix.”
Moreover, Democrats on the committee are even challenging arguments advanced by supporters on the committee that the impact on insurance agents from the MLR is “devastating,” and is impacting jobs.
The provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) limits administrative costs on health care premiums to 15 percent on large groups and 20 percent on small group and individual market premiums.
The legislation only impacts agents serving the small group and individual markets.
The bill also requires Health and Human Services (HHS) to defer to state insurance commissioners regarding requests for MLR waivers.
In asking the committee to report out the legislation today, Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., chairman of the committee, said that, PPACA’s MLR requirement gives the HHS sweeping power over the design of health insurance at the expense of consumer choice.”
He added that, “The MLR rule also punishes agents and brokers who help families and employers find an affordable health plan that best fits their needs.”
However, E&C panel Democrats said in a background brief that while the MLR has been in effect, the number of jobs in the agent and broker field has increased not decreased.
“Since May 2012, 7,000 jobs were added, according to the non-partisan Insurance Information Institute,” the Democratic statement said.
The Democratic statement also said that, “In making MLR adjustment requests to the HHS, no state could prove – and many never seriously contended – that the 80/20 rule was having a negative impact on consumers’ ability to obtain broker services.”
Another hurdle for the legislation is an HHS study released last week that said consumers have saved $2.1 billion over the last year because of the MLR.
Healthcare for America Now, which lobbied for the health care bill, also sent a statement to the committee noting that in 2012, nearly 13 million consumers received rebates of $1.1 billion from insurers with excessive administrative expenditures in the previous year.
“The 80/20 rule is also putting downward pressure on insurance premiums as insurers with high administrative costs work to become more efficient,” the Healthcare for America Now, statement said.
Agents demanded prompt action.
Ryan Young, IIABA senior director of federal government affairs, said that “If the MLR calculation is not quickly corrected to exclude agent compensation, consumers are at risk of losing the professional, licensed guidance of insurance agents during this time of great change in the health insurance market.”
Robert Smith, NAIFA president, said that, “Including insurance brokers’ compensation in the MLR is a bad idea, so we welcome progress toward getting their commissions removed from the calculation.”
Smith said that since the MLR went into effect, NAIFA members who provide health coverage “have seen their compensation decrease dramatically.
“This doesn’t just hurt the brokers, but also their employees and, most importantly, the consumers who rely on them to obtain coverage and assistance in understanding the complex health care law,” Smith said.
Originally published on LifeHealthPro.com
The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily those of ProducersWEB.
Post Press Release
Reprinting or reposting this article without prior consent of Producersweb.com is strictly prohibited.
If you have questions, please visit our terms and conditions