Decumulation and selling into a lossArticle added by Jeff Reed on July 22, 2014
San Diego, CA
Joined: May 07, 2012
Ranked: #31 (1,737 pts)
Most of you will understand the term "selling into a loss." Decumulation? Maybe not. It is, however, a much more descriptive term than “the income phase,” as it is literally the opposite of accumulation. As such, certain things that work in a client’s favor during the accumulation phase — like dollar cost averaging — work against them during decumulation.
During decumulation, dollar cost averaging becomes selling into a loss, and it can spell big trouble for an investment portfolio.
Quantifying the risk
Just how significant can this decumulation risk be? According to one study compiled by AXA, it can spell the difference between a portfolio that lasts a lifetime and one that expires before the client. Consider the following:
A male, age 65, with a $2.5 million investment portfolio decides to pull the trigger and retire. He takes an income of $175,000 the first year of retirement and inflates that number by 1 percent each year to take some of the edge off of inflation. The client’s timing is horrible in some ways, as his market experience mirrors that of the time period from 1973 to 2000, starting with two big down years.
Over the long haul, however, his investment portfolio returns exactly what the S&P does over this period of time, 13.73 percent, and experiences only six down years. Seems like a successful ride into retirement, right? Perhaps not.
By the time this client reaches age 85, his once robust $2.5 million is now worth a mere $1.2 million. His annual income needs have grown to approximately $215,00 per year, and he better get busy dying because he is going to run out of money in the very near future — 5 to 7 years, depending on market performance.
If, however, he were able to pull income from another source that was not subject to market losses in years following those six down years, his portfolio would grow to nearly $9 million, and he could happily look forward to many more years of retirement income.
The question, then, is where to find the income? And for that, we need to travel back in time to when the client was age 45. Back then, he decided to fund a life insurance contract to create some additional retirement income. He was conservative in his approach, because he viewed it as a hedge against market losses. With that goal in mind, he considered the following product attributes essential:
The life insurance contract needed to be funded at about $17,500 per year to have enough cash value at age 65 to provide a real income hedge. Coming up with that additional funding on top of what he was contributing to his other investments was tough, so he and his agent looked at two different funding scenarios to compare to the unhedged portfolio:
- Insulation from market losses. Whether by a guaranteed floor or a guaranteed minimum rate of return each year, he wanted to know that his insurance would not suffer the same losses as the balance of his investment portfolio.
- Access to cash values that would also be insulated from market losses. This means using withdrawals to basis followed by “wash” loans to eliminate the possibility of taking a big interest hit if the product performance did not exceed the loan interest.
- A conservative rate of return assumption. Sure, he wants his assets to grow over time, but the place to be aggressive is in his investment portfolio managed by his planner, not in his life insurance contract. In fact, the insurance contract being designed this way gives him the confidence to be a bit more aggressive in his other positions.
The good news is that this strategy works in either funding scenario, as outlined below:
- Scenario 1: The unhedged portfolio.
- Scenario 2: Funding the life insurance with additional investable assets each year.
- Scenario 3: Funding the life insurance by reallocating a portion of his existing investable assets on an annual basis.
The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily those of ProducersWEB.
Reprinting or reposting this article without prior consent of Producersweb.com is strictly prohibited.
If you have questions, please visit our terms and conditions