By Paula Aven Gladych
Shifting its enforcement policy away from companies that are unlikely to default on their pensions
benefited about 50 businesses by almost $1 billion since the start of the pilot program announced in November, according to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
The new policy screens out financially sound companies and small plans with less than 100 people, which excludes 92 percent of businesses that sponsor plans from the agency’s enforcement efforts.
"By focusing on companies that pose real risk, we hope to preserve and encourage companies to continue to offer traditional pensions," said PBGC Director Josh Gotbaum.
The shift in policy exempted financially sound companies such as Anheuser-Busch InBev, Procter & Gamble Co., and Whirlpool Corp., from having to address pension liabilities after ending operations at their work sites.
Under the pilot program, PBGC
didn't enforce pension liabilities of about $475 million on 30 companies that were financially sound.
Additionally, the agency ended pre-existing enforcement agreements originally valued at $450 million with 17 companies because they were unlikely to default on pension benefits for their workers and retirees.
The agency's policy change follows a Presidentially-mandated review of regulations and feedback from companies that said PBGC targeted businesses even when plans posed little or no risk of defaulting on pension obligations. Under a section of pension law called 4062(e), when a company ceases operations at a facility, and 20 percent of workers in the pension plan lose their jobs, PBGC requires financial assurance to support benefits earned by plan participants. Typically companies provide that assurance through additional contributions
to the plan or a letter of credit guaranteeing future contributions.
PBGC protects the pension benefits of more than 40 million Americans in private-sector pension plans.
Originally published on BenefitsPro.com