Great news: Court vacates Rule 151A on July 12, 2010Article added by Kim O'Brien on July 14, 2010
Kim O

Kim O'Brien

Washington, DC

Joined: October 13, 2006

Here is an excerpt from the Order:

"Having determined that the SEC's S. 2(b) analysis is lacking, we grant the petitions [assertion that] the SEC failed properly to consider the effect of the rule upon efficiency, competition, and capital formation... We therefore order that Rule 151A be vacated."

» View vacate order

» View revised opinion

What does this mean?

The Battle is NOT OVER! Theoretically, the SEC can re-propose Rule 151A, and this decision to vacate the Rule does not preclude that possibility. We need the Financial Reform legislation -- with the Harkin Amendment that will clarify what constitutes an insurance product -- to move forward and be passed by the Senate and signed into law. NAFA will remain vigilant and we will need your continued assistance. While we are pleased with the decision of the court, we should be cautious in what we say and send out publicly until we know the outcome of the legislation. We would not want to do or say anything that could jeopardize the final passage of the Harkin Amendment.

*For further information, or to contact this author, please leave a comment and your e-mail address in the forum below.
The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily those of ProducersWEB.
Reprinting or reposting this article without prior consent of is strictly prohibited.
If you have questions, please visit our terms and conditions
Post Article